I have it from a reliable source that at one point
during his speech at the ACRL conference
in Indianapolis this past March, Henry
Rollins re-emphasized the significant impact on his life of the music of
The Clash and of the music of John Coltrane. The latter might be a bit
surprising, although Rollins did record Everything
with Charles Gayle
and Rashied Ali in 1996, so Coltrane
has been with him all along. He has said that he first heard Coltrane from
records his mother owned, but that what he took from Coltrane's music wasn't
spiritual or even musical, but a kind of directness, a fierce honesty that
models intense communication: "I
am not a musician. I have written a lot of songs but it's just to get the words
out. I always admired Coltrane for his truth and his purity. He was really
going for something. He is inspiring because you can tell every moment he plays
is sincere. I have never heard anything like it." (The same thing
might even be said for Joe Strummer's gruff, insistent, committed vocals.) As
far as my own listening goes, I think I have been struggling (or maybe
something less agonistic: aspiring) to reconcile the collisions of Coltrane and
The Clash, conflicted aesthetics aimed at what I tend to divide into the
transcendent and the world-bound, the excessive and the mundane, contemplative restraint and expressive intensity. One conceptual
trajectory that might bridge such bifurcations is the idea, and the practice,
of what I'd call commitment. It became a key word in my Embouchure
project, and it makes a kind of sense, for me, to re-invoke it here. One of the
reasons I have picked up on what Henry Rollins has to say about Coltrane's
music is that his tastes, his preferences, seem to coincide with my own: he
says he is most drawn to late Coltrane, post 1964. And he's consistently
skeptical about any all-too-easy professions of enlightenment or poetic
transport: he's no mystic, but a demystifier. That doesn't make his work
any less searching, any less committed to honest, hard engagement with a will
to truth, to truthfulness. But it does depend on how you understand what and
when and how that truth might be.
The recent release of the "complete" studio recordings for John Coltrane's Sun Ship – first issued in edited form posthumously, in 1971 – aims materially toward full disclosure of historical and music fact, to paint a vivid, truthful sound-picture of the improvisatory collective creative process of the Coltrane-Tyner-Garrison-Jones quartet by offering for public issue every listenable scrap of music and studio chatter extant on tape. This is definitely a music of plenitudes: the huge swathes of saxophone, the dense piano, the rolling bass-lines and the surging drums characteristic of the quartet's last days together, and of the music Coltrane made from 1964 until his death in 1967. The session that produces Sun Ship takes place on 28 August 1965, and, apart from a first pass at the "Meditations" suite on September 2 (issued later as First Meditations), this is the last time the "classic" Coltrane quartet will record together as a unit. (McCoy Tyner and Elvin Jones will leave in November, replaced by Alice Coltrane and Rashied Ali: all of this information is well-known, and well-circulated.) So in so many respects, this music has immense historical value and interest, and every detail is worth hearing. Even the fragments and outtakes can be heard as stunning performances unto themselves. The false starts and apparent missteps overflow with powerful, potent music. Everything happens.
It’s
tempting to want to hear what
Walter Benjamin might have called a messianic totality in these recordings,
a vital archival gathering of historical minutiae – the digital imprint of every
essential sonic particle – into an absolute and audible present. We can imagine
ourselves there, as we listen – or can imagine the “there” of those searching
performances now here, relocated in our own immediate moments. That’s how
recording works, sure, but the idea of a “complete” package such as this one is
to seem to place us, aurally, in close proximity to the music’s realization.
And it works, of course: McCoy Tyner’s solos on both versions of “Sun Ship” are
astounding instances of extemporaneous dynamism, but more than that they refuse
to settle even on repeated listenings, re-creating the sound of surprise
– at each return, they still never sound the same, even though they must be. Historical
value collapses into what feels like an exploratory, unsettled present tense. Hearing
Jimmy Garrison patiently evolve and re-shape his solo prelude to “Ascent”
reaffirms his careful attention to depth of tone, to the rounded resonances of
his instrument; in his ensemble work, too, I can hear foreshadows of William
Parker’s elastic sense of time and line (in his recordings with David S. Ware or his In Order to Survive quartet). But that influence also seems to
dissolve in the palpable immediacy of Garrison’s playing.
What strikes me most about this session both works against and strangely reinforces this idea of a reanimated
plenitude, of a musical Jetztzeit. A
little of the studio banter was included in the original release of Sun Ship, but now most tracks contain extended snippets of “studio conversation”; rather than mar the music in any way – they
don’t, of course – and rather than merely let us hear bits of the musicians’
speaking voices, as if they are with us again in our own sound-spaces, the
loose fragments of casual chatter present a stark contrast to the intensities
of the performances. The quartet can shift on a dime from chuckling about a
track title to overwhelmingly powerful improvisation. How is it, I keep asking
myself, that a music of such depth and wonder can co-exist so unproblematically
with the casual and the mundane? Though maybe, maybe, that seemingly effortless
coexistence is exactly what this music can teach us, can let us overhear.
No comments:
Post a Comment