The first thing we hear in
the Veronica Mars movie is a snippet
of audio from a telephone message, a young woman’s voice asking for her help.
The same plea, the same phrasing – “Veronica, I need your help” – will arrive
in Veronica Mars’s cellphone inbox, this time from her former boyfriend and
antagonist Logan Echolls, a few minutes into the film, setting the main
narrative in motion, a nouveau noir-ish
tale about her return to Neptune California to investigate the murder of a pop
star with whom she attended high school, and who was part of the privileged
crowd of so-called 09ers around whom the storylines of the original
three-season television series largely revolved. The movie revisits
and remakes the series, of course, but this revision involves much more
than nostalgically transplanting an extended new episode of the series onto a
big screen. In many ways, the contrast between the cinematic and television
screens is no longer an issue of screen size or aspect ratio, which are increasingly
and asymptotically close, but rather a question of how that image-system is
managed and delivered; Veronica Mars,
you could argue, self-consciously puts this screen-to-screen medium-shift at
issue, investigating how media wrangle and shape not only audience and fandom –
our committed and even addictive reception of television drama – but also our
shared perceptual apparatuses: how, as a public, we train ourselves to watch
(both as onlookers and as surveillance) and how these communal practices of looking
and of listening remediate our worlds. As viewers, I’m saying, we implicitly
need Veronica Mars, or television
like it, to help us.
The opening scenes of the movie take place in a
fictional office space and studio for This
American Life, for whom Veronica’s current love-interest Piz – carried
over from the third season of the TV show – works as an on-air personality. (We
first glimpse him speaking into a microphone.) Now, I’m working from sketchy
notes and memory, having only seen the movie once, last night, but as I
remember it, Veronica gets the call from Logan as she and Piz exit the building
where the studio and offices are housed, and a street musician with an acoustic
guitar is playing a version of the opening lines of the series theme-song, The Dandy Warhols’s “We Used to be
Friends”: “A long time ago, we used to be friends, / But I haven’t thought of
you lately at all.” There are layers of sound, I’m suggesting, particularly of
voices, in play at this moment. Here, talk-radio and theme-song offer us a metonymies
of the detective-film voiceover (Kristen Bell’s narration defines the teen noir soundscape of the original show)
and of soundtrack (an echo ghosted into Veronica’s displaced life, nine years
and a continent away from Neptune). The movie literalizes on the screen what
its lyrics declare. We hear Veronica’s inner monologue, what she’s “thinking of,”
lately: a snappy fusion of Philip
Marlowe and Nancy Drew, maybe, but more than that a textual identification of
Veronica’s subject-position, her point-of-view, with our viewership, inviting
spectators to become co-investigators, and temporary friends. But we also hear
in that contrapuntal layering of voices a fraught nostalgia, a “need” that
Veronica will soon feel, the pull of her high school life (she has, we also
discover in the scenes at This American
Life, been refusing Wallace Fennel’s text-message invitations to come to
their ten-year Neptune High reunion), but also that informs a return to the
pleasures of television drama, as we are reunited as viewers with the show
itself – although it’s been seven years, not nine, but who’s counting. My point
is, I think, that this return, this nostos,
this homecoming, is both shaped and managed by the textual and aural mediations
of the voice, layers that we hear and (in word-bubbles, on screens, on paper
evidence, and in the opening montage) also see.
Veronica frequently frames her return as addiction. Logan,
for instance, is the bad boy rich kid lover in Neptune she can’t resist, while
Piz – in New York, where Veronica’s potential career as a lawyer is about to
bloom – stands for everything a good guy ought to be. It’s important to
recognize, though, that despite her attachments to boyfriends and to her
father, and despite her character’s obvious uptake and re-purposing, on screen,
of aspects of both the ingénue and the femme
fatale, Veronica consistently refused in the TV series and continues to
refuse throughout the movie to be contained or determined by masculine desire.
The help that Logan or that anyone needs
from her is not so much erotic fulfillment as it is a kind of necessary
deconstruction, a subversion from within, of the stultifying constraints of a
patriarchal social system choking on its own authoritarian narcissism. The new
corrupt Sherriff Lamb in the movie, for instance, skeevily played by Jerry
O’Connell, is taken down by Veronica’s manipulation of his vanity, his own
perverse need to be in the media, as seen on TV. As with the original series,
the movie concerns itself with the murder of a girl, this time a pop starlet
with the stage name of Bonnie DeVille – the “good demon”? – a victim whose
Catholic guilt (her recent album is
called Confession) seems to be getting
the better of her celebrity. Bonnie’s manufactured and sanitized image begins
to crack, and to expose its fraudulence and underlying depravity, a disclosure
that’s abetted by Veronica’s visual acuity, as she and we begin carefully
perusing video, photographic and textual clues. The crime behind the crime,
involving another murdered girl, also hinges on a crucial photograph, which the
murderer possesses, and uses to blackmail those complicit in the girls’ deaths.
(I’m pulling my descriptive punches here, a little; I don’t want to spoil the
plot, for those who haven’t seen the movie.) The help that Veronica offers her
friends and offers us, at her own peril, is a corrective, a remediation of how
we look at images and what we see. It’s about solving a mystery, of course, but
she also proactively fixes what amounts to an uninterrogated and even deadly
male gaze by actively directing us to re-think, lately, what we have missed.
In his introduction to a 2006 “unauthorized” collection of
essays on Veronica Mars, creator Rob
Thomas – who writes and directs the movie – claims that the show “saved [his]
career and, less importantly, [his] soul,” and that it does so by allow him to
participate in the remediation of the medium of television itself:
I
taught high school during my mid-twenties in Austin, Texas. I have clear
memories of sitting in my living room watching TV and wondering how clearly
god-awful programming made it on the air.
He needed and TV needed, he
suggests, Veronica Mars’s help as much as the rest of us. Framed as cultural
pedagogy, a late return to the unfulfilled social promises of high school. Veronica Mars, in 2006 when he writes,
is imperiled as a program and will very soon be cancelled, but Thomas is keen
to articulate his gratitude for the transformative work that Veronica Mars continued to undertake, a
transformation that hinged on an emerged viewership, a fandom, tied to visual
and narrative acuity, to paying close attention:
We’re
in the middle of our third season, so we’ve defied the odds, and I can say with
absolute certainty, there’s nothing about Veronica
Mars that I take for granted. Sure, we don’t do well in the ratings, but
our fans are fervent, and they pay attention to detail.
Veronica
Mars,
for him, is about this renovated – and I would say critically-focused –
attentiveness, about thinking of you,
lately and carefully. The movie was made possible by a
Kickstarter campaign that raised in short-order over five million dollars
in crowd-sourced funding from donations by more than 91000 fans (donations for
which they received early access to digital versions of the completed film).
The movie is, in many ways, a love-letter to those fans, but I think it might
be better understood as something like a response to the need for help, and for
friendship, that the opening telephone message articulates. (Fandom, a potentially
psychotic fandom, might also be the motive for the murder Veronica
investigates.)
At one point, Veronica has flowers delivered to Gia, one of
her not-so-friendly friends (and whose name, coincidentally, resonates at least
for me with the final syllables of nostalgia),
and of course the bouquet contains a bug. Veronica tells Logan, over the
cellphone, that she has had to use some “old school” tech she has swiped from
her father, an FM transmitter that narrowcasts to what she thinks is an unused
frequency on the public dial. Meanwhile, she sets up her camera – the one with
the huge telephoto lens, an iconic holdover from the TV series, reproduced on the movie poster – across
from Gia’s apartment, and, through a set of cinematic echoes of Rear Window (including the lens itself) – we listen to and watch Gia
through a grid of windows. Again, the film layers media and voices, reminding
us – in the impurity of the audio or the grid-work of the window panes – of the
thickness, of the materiality of mediation. We see the graphic surfaces and
hear the interferences, the apparatuses that get in our way as much as they
enable our access – to information, to character, and even to Neptune’s
imaginary spaces. The movie, in my view, feels like television, and I’m not
entirely sure why, but part of that sense has to do with its attention not only
to smallness, to luminous particulars, but also with its audiovisual
self-awareness. Tele-vision – as “distant” seeing – hinges as a medium not only
on the feint of intimacy, a scopophilia inherent in surveillance and in the
sharp visual analysis on which Veronica’s “investigations” depend, but also on
a kind of telephoto thickening, a quality of light. The burnished visual
textures that I have come to associate with the fictional Neptune – the red
light, for instance, suffused by stained glass throughout Keith Mars’s office –
become symptomatic in the film of an almost tactile proximity, a mildly hellish
twilight that betokens the lateness, the late return, in which the show is
enmeshed. It also draws us in, inviting to reconsider and to investigate our
own desires to watch, to look, to see.
No comments:
Post a Comment